Navigation District Report Card
Aransas County Navigation District Report Card
Two District Commissioners are up for re-election on November
8. The voters should consider the following report card on the District before
they cast their votes.
Compliance with
the Texas Open Meetings and Open Records Laws – Grade F
Every District Monday meeting held since Hurricane Harvey has
been illegal because the District has not properly posted its meetings in
compliance with the Texas Open Meetings Act requirements. They were told of this non-compliance in January 2022 and did nothing to correct it.
The District has not posted any minutes of its meeting on the
District website since May 2021
The District does not produce monthly financial reports for
public review even after an FOIA request made in February 2022
The District does not compare actual results to budget projections
at any time during the fiscal year even though that is a requirement for
entities that have an Annual Audit.
Compliance with
Texas Elections Laws – Grade F
In June 2022, Commissioner Moore signed an election document
that contained an erroneous deadline for filing -- a deadline that has been on the
State election calendar for more than a year.
In August 2022, Harbor Master Keith Barrett signed an
Election Addendum backdating the effective date, effectively denying candidates
having a position on the ballot.
The District was asked to produce the Agenda and Minutes to
legitimize these two election documents but did not do so, thereby making these
two actions violations of the Texas Open Meetings Act.
Commissioner Moore in a letter to Mike Probst publicly
admitted that he and the District had violated Texas election laws and denied candidates of their right to be on the ballot. He apologized for it.
Operating the
District in the Best Interests of Local Taxpayers – Grade F
In September 2022, the Aransas County Commissioners Court
asked the District to provide its prior years’ budgets along with the current
budget in advance of the Court’s hearing to set the District’s ad valorem tax
rate request. The District failed to supply the requested information prior to
the meeting, effectively forcing the Commissioners Court to approve the
District’s requested tax rate without the benefit of any review of the
reasonableness of the tax rate.
The District has nearly $10,000,000 in unrestricted reserves
(more than all of the other Aransas County government entities combined), and
still asked the Commissioners Court to approve a tax rate that will cost
Aransas County property owners almost $2 million in taxes in 2023.
The District’s audited financial statements shows that the
District operates as a for profit business enterprise, whose revenues
consistently exceed its operating and debt expenses and therefore does not need
and should not receive ad valorem taxes.
Conflicts of
Interest – Grade F
In 2008, newly elected Commissioner Tommy Moore abstained
from the vote on a lease contract with a barge mooring company because he had a
financial interest and/or business relationship with the company. Five years later when the lease was up for
renewal, Commissioner Moore voted for renewal of the lease at a significantly
reduced rate and did not mention his business relationship.
In July 2022, Commissioner Moore claimed to a fellow
Commissioner that he (Moore) was the exclusive sales representative for a local
company, which was later awarded a sizeable contract to perform work for the District.
Does the phrase “conflict of interest” have any meaning to
the District and Commissioner Moore?
Operating the District
in Compliance with Statutory Grant of Authority – Grade F
In late 2021 and throughout 2022, the District has claimed
it has the authority to control stormwater runoff from the community into
Little Bay, Rockport Harbor, and all other navigable waters within its
jurisdiction. The District has spent thousands of taxpayers’ dollars on
attorneys, engineers, and public relations consultants to defend and assert
this authority. As a direct result of the District’s actions, the completion of
the Concho Street drainage project has been delayed, the cost of the project has
increased, and the lives and property of affected citizens in downtown Rockport
have been endangered in the event of a significant rain event.
But the District does not have the authority to control
stormwater runoff. Despite efforts by
the City to reach a reasonable compromise, the District has continued to assert
its unfounded authority and makes unworkable and unreasonable demands,
continually backing out of agreements previously reached.
The District has operated the Rockport Beach and the
District Festival grounds for years. Serious questions have been raised about
the District’s authority to engage in these activities since they are not in
any manner related to the statutory purposes, duties, and powers of the
District. When concerned citizens raised questions about this matter, the
Harbor Master and Commissioner Moore convened a meeting of a number of
representatives of non-profit organizations who are major users of the District
festival grounds. At the meeting, veiled threats were made by Commissioner
Moore that the organizations would not be allowed to stage their various
festivals unless they sided with the District and pressured the local citizens
to stop questioning the legal authority of the District. Most local citizens remember when the beach
park belonged to them and did not have to pay an exorbitant fee to use it.
Final Report Card
– Grade F
The District and Commissioners have failed to do their jobs and
should not be allowed to serve in their elected positions. Two of the
Commissioners (Tommy Moore and Mickey Casterline) are on the November 8 ballot
to be re-elected as Commissioners. The voters should take into consideration
the District’s performance before they vote. Voters do have a choice and should
be heard.
Comments
Post a Comment